Legal Opinion

State v. MacMillan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 1, 2005No. 2004-402PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The State appeals an order of the Superior Court (T. Nadeau, J.) denying the State’s motion in limine to admit testimony pertaining to an Internet conversation between the defendant, Roland MacMillan, and Detective Frank Warchol of the Portsmouth Police Department. We reverse and remand.

The following facts are undisputed. On August 22, 2002, Detective Warchol posed as a fourteen-year-old girl in an Internet chat room using the screen name “Kimmiesue87.” The defendant, using the screen name ‘Willpay4BJ,” contacted “Kimmiesue87” through a private instant message. After being told that she was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. JarabekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. People v. GervasiIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. WhitteySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. YatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. State v. LottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. In Re PeiranoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. State v. McLeodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  5. State v. PolkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API