Legal Opinion
State v. Lott
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 15, 2005No. 2004-380PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Christopher Lott, was convicted of one class B felony count of using computer services in a manner prohibited by the law. See RSA 649-B:4 (Supp. 2004). The defendant appeals an order of the Superior Court (T. Nadeau, J.) denying his motion to suppress evidence that he contends had been obtained by the State in violation of RSA 570-A:2 (2001) (amended 2002, 2003, 2004), which prohibits wiretapping and eavesdropping. We affirm.
On May 13, 2002, Detective Frank Warchol signed on to ‘Tahoo! Messenger” (Yahoo! IM), posing as a fourteen-year-old girl with the screen name…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Commonwealth v. ProettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- State v. ChickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- United States v. Tery JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DislerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- E.C.O. v. ComptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. OppenheimMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
- State v. OakesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- In re Alex C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.