Commonwealth v. Jarabek
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
This case comes before us on an interlocutory appeal by the Commonwealth from the decision of a Superior Court judge allowing the defendants’ motion to suppress evidence of certain recorded conversations as having been obtained in violation of the Massachusetts interception statute, G. L. c. 272, § 99. The judge ordered the suppression not merely of the taped recordings of the conversations, but also of live testimony regarding the conversations. We conclude that G. L. c. 272, § 99, requires the suppression of the unlawfully intercepted recordings and of any evidence derived therefrom but…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BloodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. D'AmourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- United States v. Allen L. JarabekCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LykusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. LongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.