Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1976No. 75-27-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

One issue is raised on appeal. If an oral communication is lawfully intercepted because of the consent of a party to the conversation but is otherwise inadmissible into evidence in a criminal prosecution due to a failure to comply with statutory requirements, does such deficiency require the additional suppression of the testimony of the consenting participant?

No reference is made in the criminal complaint to the radio device. Although the undercover officer was not the complainant, the complaint recites his statements to the complainant of his observation of the illicit offer to commit an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BloodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. State v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. LucasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. MaloneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API