Legal Opinion

Buesa v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 2009No. B212854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in an action against the City of Los Angeles (City) 1 brought by two former Los Angeles police officers, Andrew Buesa and Michael Cardenas. Plaintiffs seek damages for a violation of their rights under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.; POBRA). 2 The gravamen of their complaint is that a perjured declaration submitted by the City deprived them of their statute of limitations defense in an administrative mandamus proceeding over their discharges. The issue is whether they…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pointe San Diego Residential Community L.P. v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Lockton v. O'ROURKECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. La Serena Properties, LLC v. WeisbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Mnyandu v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Super. Ct. (Vandenburgh)California Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API