Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 9, 1926No. 25,433PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying the defendant bank the relief hereinafter mentioned.
On November 27, 1923, the defendant Federal Construction Company entered into a contract' with the city of St. Paul for the erection of the Gorman Schoolhouse. The contract price was $38,977. The usual public contractor’s bond was given, the plaintiff becoming surety thereon.
Sometime in the summer of 1923 the construction company began to borrow money from the defendant bank, giving assignments of moneys due under other contracts it had with the city. Early in the fall the company informed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Ganley v. City of PipestoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Barrett Bros. Co. v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- National Surety Co. v. BerggrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. WurtzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Camdenton Consolidated School District No. 6 Ex Rel. W. H. Powell Lumber Co. v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Farmers State Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- First Nat. Bank of St. Paul v. McHasco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- First National Bank of Aitkin v. HagquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.