Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Aitkin v. Hagquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1929No. 27,274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant company’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff appealed.

Defendant company, herein mentioned as defendant, became surety on Hagquist’s bond to Tingdale Bros. Inc. conditioned for the faithful performance of a construction contract and the payment of all claims for labor and material used therein. The contract called for payments on estimates of the work done from time to time.

Hagquist, the contractor, made a written contract with plaintiff reciting the contractual relations and his necessity for money with which to carry on the work; and therein this language is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Chisholm v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Finch v. EnkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Federal Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. M. J. O'neil, Inc. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. County of Audrain Ex Rel. First National Bank of Mexico v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API