State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Environmental Defense Fund
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-133.8(a)(6) includes “biomass resource,” among the list of resources qualifying as “renewable energy resources,” the North Carolina Utilities Commission did not err in determining that wood derived from whole trees in primary harvest is a “biomass resource” and thus a “renewable energy resource” within the meaning of the statute.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
North Carolina’s Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (“REPS”), N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-133.8(b), requires electric public utilities to meet renewability and efficiency…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- North Carolina Turnpike Authority v. Pine Island, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Capricorn Equity Corp. v. Town of Chapel Hill Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wake County v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State of NC ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. N.C. Waste Awareness & Reduction NetworkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State of NC v. NC Sustainable Energy Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- In re Town of Smithfield for Approval of Agreement between Electric Suppliers with Carolina Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Ha v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.