Legal Opinion

State of NC v. NC Sustainable Energy Ass'n

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 2017No. COA16-1067PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Judge.

Appellant North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association ("NCSEA") appeals from a ruling from the North Carolina Utilities Commission (the "Commission") that "a topping cycle CHP system does not constitute an energy efficiency measure under [N.C.G.S. §] 62-133.8(a)(4), except to the extent that the ... waste heat component is used and meets the definition of [an] energy efficiency measure in [N.C.G.S. §] 62-133.8(a)(4)." We disagree and hold that, for the purposes of classifying a topping cycle CHP as an energy efficiency measure, N.C.G.S. § 62-133.8(a)(4) (2015) is unambiguous.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  4. High Rock Lake Partners, LLC v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Dare County Board of Education v. SakariaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re De Luca USMCRCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Mitchell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  3. Mitchell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  4. State v. PilandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. PilandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API