Legal Opinion

Blain v. Willson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1891PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to the district court for Hall county. Tried below before Harrison, J. The holding in N E. Mtge. Co. v. Aughe, 12 Neb., 504, is a mere diotum and is contrary to the better rule as held ■elsewhere. (Porter v. Mount, 3 Am.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Hall county. Tried below before Harrison, J. The holding in N E. Mtge. Co. v. Aughe, 12 Neb., 504, is a mere diotum and is contrary to the better rule as held ■elsewhere. (Porter v. Mount, 3 Am. Law Reg. [N. S.], 493; Wheaton v. Hibbard, 20 Johns. [N. Y.], 291; Schroeppel v. Corniny, 6 N. Y., 107; Tiffany v. Boatman’s Savings Inst., 18 Wall. [U. S.J, 375; 3 Parsons, Cont. [1866 Ed.], 127, and notes.) Especially if the payment is involuntary, it may be recovered back. (Darst v. Broelcway, 11 O., 463; Woodworth v. Huntoon, 40 III., 131.) Richards v. Kowntze, 4…

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

The sole question in this case is: Can the maker of a promissory note tainted with usury, who has been compelled to pay it to an innocent purchaser, recover of the original payee a sum equal to the amount of the usurious consideration ?

The statute relating to usury provides that “If a greater rate of interest than is hereinbefore allowed shall be contracted for or received or reserved, the contract shall not, therefore, be void; but if in any action on such con-' tract proof be made that illegal interest has been directly or indirectly contracted for, or taken, or reserved, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ransom v. HaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  2. Hadden v. InnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. New England Mortgage Security Co. v. AugheNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Nicholls v. SkeelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  5. Quinn v. BoyntonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lee v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Schlattman v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Jaffa v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gross v. CoffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Chakford v. SturmSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API