Legal Opinion

Pim, Inc. v. Steinbichler Optical Tech. USA, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2003No. Docket Nos. 120989, 120990, COA Nos. 220053, 222221PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

660 N.W.2d 73 (2003)

PIM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

STEINBICHLER OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., Derek Milligan and Michael S. Burgess, Defendants-Appellants, and

B-M Intellectual Properties, Defendant.

Steinbichler Optical Technologies USA, Inc., Derek Milligan and Michael S. Burgess, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

PIM, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and

Venture Heavy Machinery, L.L.C., Deluxe Pattern Corporation and Larry Winget, Proposed Intervening Defendants.

Docket Nos. 120989, 120990, COA Nos. 220053, 222221.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 30, 2003.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Matthew's Evangelical Lutheran Church v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bil-Gel Company v. ThomaMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duray Development, LLC v. PerrinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. David J McQueer v. Perfect Fence CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  3. House v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Howard-Johnson v. V & S Detroit Galvanizing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  5. Anthony Johnson d/b/a First National Home Management/Consultant v. Westfield Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API