Legal Opinion
Howard-Johnson v. V & S Detroit Galvanizing, LLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 21, 2012No. Case No. 10-13870PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Darryl Johnson was fatally injured in an industrial accident while he was working for his employer, defendant V & S Detroit Galvanizing, LLC. His estate has sued the employer, alleging that its conduct has brought it within the so-called “intentional tort exception” to the exclusive remedy provision in Michigan’s Worker’s Disability Compensation Act. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, now pending before the Court, arguing that the facts in the case developed so far do not support…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Alexander v. CareSourceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Mt. Lebanon Personal Care Home, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walston v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Walston v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014