Legal Opinion
DiPaolo v. Moran
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 10, 2005No. 04-1670, 04-1769PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Before us is the imposition of a sanction under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with the sanctioned party arguing that a sanction was not warranted and the opposing party contending that the District Court should have awarded a monetary sanction. For the reasons that follow, we affirm both of the District Court’s determinations.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
Appellant Brian Puricelli filed the underlying action on behalf of his client, Gregory DiPaolo, in November 1999, claiming that the Bensalem Police Department’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. LingleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Gerald Zuk v. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute of the Medical College of Pennsylvania, Benjamin G. LipmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Eugene Landon, Cyril A. Moyer and Martin Campbell v. Bruce Hunt, Carol J. Hunt and A. Cruickshanks, IVCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Garr v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- DiPaolo v. MoranDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
3Cited by26 opinions
- Magdalene M. Smoot and Ryan M. Smoot v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. And Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Lori Moeck v. Pleasant Valley School DistricCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Morris v. DiPaoloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Legair v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Bruce v. City of Pittston, PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.