Legal Opinion
DiPaolo v. Moran
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 27, 2003No. CIV.A.99-5974PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOHN, District Judge.
Gregory DiPaolo (“DiPaolo”) through his attorney, Brian Puricelli, Esquire (“Puricelli”), filed this action against fif teen defendants, among whom are Neil A. Moms, Esquire (“Morris”) and Neil A. Morris Associates, P.C. (“law firm”) (collectively “defendants”), alleging a multiplicity of claims against each for violations of plaintiffs rights under the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions and Pennsylvania state law. Early on in this litigation, it became apparent that there was extensive bad blood between Puricelli and Morris involving not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alpert, Goldberg v. QuinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Musaelian v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Elwood v. DrescherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- DiPaolo v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Morris v. DiPaoloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.