En Taik Ha v. Kang
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in a matter involving a partnership.
A résumé of some of the facts is as follows:
Plaintiff, together with a friend, Mabel Lim, orally entered into a partnership agreement with the defendant on or about November 1, 1948, for the purpose of buying income property in the city of Los Angeles. The plaintiff was a Korean national and was not learned or schooled in the English language or in the ways of doing business in Los Angeles County. Defendant was a fellow countryman and a long time friend of plaintiff and the plaintiff’s family.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Koyer v. WillmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Perelli-Minetti v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Tuttle v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Kaljian v. MenezesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- In re: Koko Sarkis BabianUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Metcalf v. MetcalfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962