Legal Opinion

In Re L. H. Duncan & Sons

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 14, 1942No. 7862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

On January 5, 1938, the partners, now bankrupt, entered into a written contract with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the construction and improvement of a section of state highway. The contract provided, “The contractor further covenants and agrees that all of said work and labor shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and that prompt payment will be made in full for labor and material used in the work.”

At the same time the partners made a written application to Maryland Casualty Company, the appellant, for the bonds required by statute.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Sundheim v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. In re Scofield Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Greer v. G. P. Fleetwood & Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Federal Insurance v. Constructora Maza, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
  3. In Re Cummins Const. CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  4. In Re Webber Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1943
  5. In Re Flotation Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API