Legal Opinion

United States v. Lemoine

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 13, 1992No. Misc. Dkt. No. 92-03PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES, Judge:

Petitioner informs us that he is an “ART,” which we take to mean an Air Reserve technician, see 32 U.S.C. § 709 (1988), and that he is a member of the Louisiana Air National Guard. He was ordered to active duty with the Air Force in his capacity as a member of the Air Force Reserve. See 10 U.S.C. § 101(22), 32 U.S.C. § 101(12) (1988). As a consequence, he was relieved from duty with the Air National Guard, 32 U.S.C. § 325(a). He was apparently also separated from his employment as a technician (at least temporarily), perhaps under 32 U.S.C. § 709(e)(1). While…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. McPhail v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. LabellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. Boudreaux v. United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military ReviewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wean v. HolderArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API