United States v. Lemoine
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES, Judge:
Petitioner informs us that he is an “ART,” which we take to mean an Air Reserve technician, see 32 U.S.C. § 709 (1988), and that he is a member of the Louisiana Air National Guard. He was ordered to active duty with the Air Force in his capacity as a member of the Air Force Reserve. See 10 U.S.C. § 101(22), 32 U.S.C. § 101(12) (1988). As a consequence, he was relieved from duty with the Air National Guard, 32 U.S.C. § 325(a). He was apparently also separated from his employment as a technician (at least temporarily), perhaps under 32 U.S.C. § 709(e)(1). While…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- McPhail v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. LabellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- Boudreaux v. United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military ReviewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wean v. HolderArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997