People v. Head
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.
The first point raised by appellant that “There is no such offense as conspiracy to commit the crimes of Burglary and Grand Theft”, is fully answered by the decision in the case of People v. Welch, 89 Cal. App. 18 [264 Pac. 324].
The second point that “The proof is insufficient to establish conspiracy”, is fully met by the evidence from which the court could draw no other conclusion than that the defendants went together into at least two different churches, and that almost the same thing happened in each of three instances. In the light of alb the evidence before the court, the only…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. EisemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Ex parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RagoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. MullaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. CalifroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Fernandez v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1957