Legal Opinion

People v. Califro

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1953No. Crim. 2906PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Defendants Lena Califro and Andrew Mareck appeal from judgments of conviction of conspiracy to commit abortions and of committing abortions, and from the orders denying their motions for new trial.

Questions Presented

1. Sufficiency of the indictments as to the conspiracy charges.

2. Sufficiency of evidence, particularly corroboration as to Lena.

3. The admission of evidence (a) of pregnancy; (b) reference to an abortion in 1939; (c) of Andrew’s confession.

4. Correctness of the denial of Lena’s motion for separate trial.

Record

Two actions were consolidated for trial. In the first action the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. EudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. MacEwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. BowlbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. KefryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API