Legal Opinion

People v. Ragone

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1948No. Crim. 2499PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OGDEN, J. pro tem.

Appellants were jointly charged and tried before a jury upon three counts, violation of section 503 of the Vehicle Code, grand theft of an automobile and conspiracy to commit burglary. They were acquitted of grand theft but were convicted upon each of the other two counts. They join in this appeal from the judgment of conviction.

In the early morning hours, about 3:30 a. m., three police officers were cruising in a police automobile along Van Ness Avenue in San Francisco. Their attention was attracted to an automobile parked at the curb in front of a restaurant just south of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. LatonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. EisemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. People v. BucchierreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. OlfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API