Bennett v. Progressive Furniture Company
North Carolina Industrial Commission
1Dissent
I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion is convincingly written based on findings that: (1) plaintiff needed to find another doctor because he could not see the authorized doctor, Dr. Rhyne, and (2) defendants did not present evidence to show that plaintiff was employable. These suggestions were contained in plaintiff's brief and/or in oral argument to the Full Commission. The record, however, does not support these and other findings by the majority.
The essential question presented is whether the Commission will decide issues of suitability of employment and continuing disability based…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Sims v. Charmes/Arby's Roast BeefCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.