Legal Opinion
Q-2 L.L.C. v. Hughes
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 2016No. Case No. 20140131PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice DURRANT,
opinion of the Court:
Introduction
"[ 1 We are asked to decide only one issue in this case: how and when does a party acquire title to property under the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence? Does title transfer by operation of law at the time the elements of boundary by acquiescence are met or by judicial decree at the time the trial court enters its order? This case arises out of a boundary dispute involving Wayne Hughes and Patricia Hampton-Hughes (collectively, Hugheses) and their neighbor, Q-2, L.L.C,. and its predecessors-in-interest (collectively, Q-2). Although the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mahoney v. Tara, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Staker v. AinsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Holmes v. JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Gorte v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Anderson v. FautinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Pioneer Home v. TaxHawkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- B.G.T.S. v. Balls Brothers FarmCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- Hi-Country Estates v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.