Bahr v. Imus

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Presiding Judge:

11 Plaintiffs Rob and Sherri Babr and Tone Senn (collectively the Bahrs) appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Jim and Melodee Imus establishing the boundary line between the Babhrs' and Imuses' properties based on a theory of boundary by estoppel. Specifically, the Bahrs argue that summary judgment was inappropriate because there are material facts in dispute and the Imuses are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 The Imuses purchased their home in 1988. Later that year, the Imuses consulted…