Legal Opinion

Vincent v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1971No. Civ. 38012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUNN, J.

On June 30, 1970 plaintiffs commenced a class action (Code Civ. Proc., § 382) for declaratory and injunctive relief from the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 13700 and a regulation promulgated pursuant thereto which prohibits payment for attendant care rendered to a recipient of benefits under the Aid to the Totally Disabled (ATD) program (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 13500 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.A. § 1351 et seq.) when such care is provided by the recipient’s spouse with whom he is living.

Plaintiffs are two ATD recipients and their wives, who furnish attendant care to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Miller v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Hypolite v. CarlesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Somers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. In re SchusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API