Legal Opinion
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 30, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 07-0150, 1 CA-CV 08-0241, 1 CA-CV 08-0344PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSEN, Judge.
¶ 1 At issue in these consolidated appeals are thousands of claims by hospitals against Maricopa County under statutes that provided for reimbursement of fees incurred in providing emergency treatment to indigents. Because of the large number of claims and the many reimbursement requirements that applied to each of them, these cases presented a huge ease-management problem for the superior court. The court ultimately entered judgment in favor of the hospitals based on findings of a Special Master who employed a novel statistical sampling methodology to resolve most of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Tarco, Inc. v. Conifer Metropolitan DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Little v. KIA Motors Am., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Bristol Bay Productions, LLC v. LampackColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.