Legal Opinion

Welton v. Township of Crystal

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1908No. Docket No. 113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Montcalm; Davis, J. Case by Dora Welton against the township of Crystal for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action brought to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff resulting from a fall on a defective walk in the unincorporated village of Crystal Lake, situated in the defendant township. The circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant, and plaintiff brings error. The facts, as the circuit judge stated them, and the claims of the respective parties as stated by him, were as follows:

“In this case, as the proof now stands, it appears that within the boundary line of the township of Crystal, this county, is a small village called Crystal Lake, located on the banks of Crystal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Findlay v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Garn v. LockardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Quinlan v. Village of ManistiqueMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Williams v. Village of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Frary v. Township of AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chaney v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Chaney v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API