Garn v. Lockard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Case by Leah V. Garn against Arthur M. Lockard for slander. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff prosecuted defendant in an action of slander. The words complained of charged, in effect, that plaintiff was the keeper of a brothel, and are charged as having been uttered in the presence and hearing of Lewis Biggs and others. Substantially the language imputed to defendant was proven to have been used by him in the presence and hearing of Mr. Biggs, who testified that he heard a part of the conversation between Lockard and Pollock, in which the name of Mrs. Garn was mentioned, and stated that it was “on Sunday, right down in front of the post-office, and Herb Pollock and Os…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bacon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Findlay v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Hoose v. Prescott InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Wieman v. MabeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Ross v. Township of IoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lawrence v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Brewer v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- McKernan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Flynn v. BoglarskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Howard v. DickieMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.