Legal Opinion

Frary v. Township of Allen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This action is brought to recover for damages occasioned by reason of a defective cross-walk.

Within the limits of the defendant township is the-unincorporated village of Allen. The principal street in the village runs in an easterly and westerly direction through the village and township, and is known as “Chicago Street" or “Chicago Turnpike." In the eastern part of the village there is a street running from Chicago street north, known as “ Prentiss street." At the head of Prentiss street, on the south side of Chicago street, is a large brick school-house, in which were-employed 3 teachers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tice v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. O'Neil v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Quinlan v. Village of ManistiqueMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Welton v. Township of CrystalMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API