Legal Opinion

Kavli v. Leifman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1940No. 32,302PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff instituted a replevin action in municipal court in the city of Minneapolis against defendant Harry Leifman to recover possession of a stoker and its appurtenances. On defendant’s motion, E. L. Kavli and John Slosson Avere brought in as additional defendants. Thereafter Leifman ansAvered putting plaintiff on proof as to her OAvnership and right to possession. He also interposed a counterclaim based on a breach of Avarranty and demanded a return of the amount paid by him on the purchase price of the stoker. The additional defendants replied to the counterclaim…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Whiting v. SquegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Seifert v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Fiterman v. J. N. Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Marquette Appliances, Inc. v. Economy Food Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. First Acceptance Corp. v. KennedyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1951
  4. Jessen Ex Rel. Jessen v. Schuneman's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Schau v. BussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API