Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moser v. Union Pacific Railroad

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1944No. 7150Published

1Dissent

For many years appellant, Union Pacific Railroad Company (hereinafter called company), has been engaged in both intra and interstate commerce, maintaining a yard at Nampa, Idaho, where eastbound and westbound trains are made up and also where trains are made up for several branches like the McCall, Murphy, Homedale, Payette and Middle Valley, P. I. N. Road. July 16, 1941, respondent strained his back while employed by the company in the Nampa yard. April 30, 1943, he filed notice of injury and claim for compensation with the State Industrial Accident Board. May 6, 1943, he filed a petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Ermin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
  5. Agostino v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API