Legal Opinion

Hannold v. Hannold

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 18, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion (not reported) filed in the Chancery Division by Judge Haneman, as follows:

"Plaintiff claims to be the owner of a one-half undivided interest in four parcels of real estate in the Borough of Swedesboro, Gloucester County, New Jersey, and she seeks partition thereof. Defendants deny plaintiff's claim of title and assert that the lands were a part of the assets of a partnership composed of plaintiff and defendants' decedent, and that the realty must, in law, be treated as personalty.
"In the year 1915, two brothers, George…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CampbellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1879
  2. Flint v. FlintNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  3. Craighead v. PikeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re Ostler's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ostler v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re Binkow's EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API