Legal Opinion

Craighead v. Pike

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 18, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In partition. Heard on bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, Y. C.

The complainant has established her right in equity to a one sixty-fourth part of the lands and premises described in the bill, and to a one sixty-fourth part of the stock of an incorporated company called the. Irondyke and Land Reclamation Company of New York, which is the owner of a tract of land adjoining that in which the complainant has established her direct equitable interest.

In round figures, the first main tract consists of about twenty-eight hundred acres, and that owned by the reclamation company about seven hundred acres.. These lands are what is known as salt marsh,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shearer v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fortugno v. Hudson Manure Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Williamson Investment Co. v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hannold v. HannoldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API