Ostler v. State Tax Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.
The widow of Harry Ostler, Allie S. Ostler, and a son, Harry R. Ostler, were named as his executors in his will. Since Mrs. Ostler elected to renounce her husband’s will and take instead the distributive share of one-third of all real property possessed by him during the marriage under U.C.A. 1953, 74-4--3, the executors excluded from their computation for the Utah State Inheritance Tax an item of $13,600, representing one-third of the value of the deceased’s interest in real property used in the business of Ostler Candy Company. The State Tax Commission gave notice…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Darrow v. . CalkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Wharf v. WharfIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Lenow v. FonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Cultra v. CultraTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. ElsburyNevada Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of FinkelsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In Re Ostler's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1955