Legal Opinion

Ostler v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1955No. 8269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.

The widow of Harry Ostler, Allie S. Ostler, and a son, Harry R. Ostler, were named as his executors in his will. Since Mrs. Ostler elected to renounce her husband’s will and take instead the distributive share of one-third of all real property possessed by him during the marriage under U.C.A. 1953, 74-4--3, the executors excluded from their computation for the Utah State Inheritance Tax an item of $13,600, representing one-third of the value of the deceased’s interest in real property used in the business of Ostler Candy Company. The State Tax Commission gave notice…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Darrow v. . CalkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Wharf v. WharfIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lenow v. FonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  4. Cultra v. CultraTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State v. ElsburyNevada Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FinkelsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  2. In Re Ostler's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API