Arey v. Lemons
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbyiN, J.
Upon an appeal from an order granting or refusing an interlocutory injunction, the Supreme Court may review both the findings of fact and the conclusions of law. Finger v. Spinning Co., 190 N.C. 74, 128 S.E. 467; Coates v. Wilkes, 92 N.C. 376.
The purpose of an interlocutory injunction is to preserve the status quo of the subject matter of the suit until a trial can be had on the merits. Boone v. Boone, 217 N.C. 722, 9 S.E. 2d 383; S. v. Scott, 182 N.C. 865, 109 S.E. 789; Harrison v. Bray, 92 N.C. 488. For this reason, an interlocutory injunction does not lie to take property out of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Coates Bros. v. . WilkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- State v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Boone v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Jones v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Clinard v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Omega Environmental, Inc. v. Gilbarco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.