Legal Opinion

Jones v. . Lassiter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1915PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff frdm an order o'f Cooke, J., dissolving an injunction, at tbe September Term, 1915, of "Wake.

1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.

This action is instituted to recover damages for alleged injury to plaintiff’s property, bealtb and business, caused by tbe operation of an aspbalt mixing plant near ber residence in tbe city of Raleigb, and to perpetually enjoin tbe defendant Lassiter from tbe operation thereof.

On 14 October, 1914, Lassiter entered into a contract with tbe city of Raleigb to pave its streets with a combination of aspbalt and concrete, carried through a high beating process, and required to be under a sufficient beat at tbe time of laying same upon tbe streets, and it was necessary that tbe plant be located…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Commissioners of Stanly CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Griffin v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. South Atlantic Waste Co. v. Raleigh, Charlotte & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Berger v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hayes-Albion Corp. v. KuberskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Huggins v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  4. Arey v. LemonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Plott v. . Comrs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API