Legal Opinion
Halkias v. General Dynamics Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1994No. 93-01664PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
These appeals present an issue of first impression in our circuit: the limitations period for an action under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109. Both district courts applied the six-month period provided by § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 160(b). We AFFIRM.
I
Two of the actions (Halkias’ and Cureing-ton’s) are against General Dynamics Corpo*227ration; one (Staudt’s), against Glastron, Inc. They concern not receiving timely notice in advance of a layoff, contrary to WARN,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- North Star Steel Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Frymire v. Ampex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Madden v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Chrysler Corp. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Alvin Staudt, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Glastron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.