Legal Opinion
Ward v. System Auto Parks & Garages, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided March 28, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 9207PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, P. J.
Judgment was entered for $271.16 in this action in which the plaintiff sought to recover the amount that he had expended for repairs to his automobile, necessitated by careless handling of the ear during the time that it was left with the defendant. The defendant appeals, relying upon the fact that the action was brought more than three months after the damage was done, and so after it was barred by the terms of the written contract of bailment set forth in haec verba in the answer. The trial court found “that the purported ‘contract’ set forth in said Affirmative defense was never entered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beeson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Tebbets v. Fidelity and Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Olds v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Connie K. HAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Capehart v. HeadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Cal. State Auto. Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Barrett Garages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Ward v. System Auto Etc. GaragesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.