Legal Opinion

Jansen v. Williams

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1893No. 4820PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

This action was brought by the defendant in error to recover the sum of $100, retained as commission from the proceeds of the sale of real property, effected by the plaintiffs in error. The petition alleged the employment of plaintiffs in error to sell said real property for the sum of $3,000, and that the plaintiff named in said petition meantime reserved for himself the right to sell said property, if he met with an opportunity to do so, before the same should be sold by plaintiffs in error; that soon after such employment the plaintiff below entered into negotiations with one E. T.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Plugger v. Township Board of OverysselMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Conkey v. . BondNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Conkey v. BondNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Englehart v. Peoria Plow Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Vogt v. Town & Country Realty of Lincoln, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Faultersack v. Clintonville Sales Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Schepers v. LautenschlagerNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Turner v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Ericson v. Nebraska-Iowa Farm Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API