Legal Opinion
Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 11, 1995No. 95 Civ. 3474, 94 Civ. 8634 and 95 Civ. 0110PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
From May 22, 1995 until June 14, 1995, this court held a hearing on Genentech, Inc.’s (“Genentech”) motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin Novo Nordisk A/S, et al. (collectively “Novo”) from infringing Genen-tech’s patent for human growth hormone product. 1 Novo had responded that Genen-teeh’s patent was invalid and non-enforceable. The motion was granted on June 28, 1995, and is now on appeal to the Federal Circuit.
At the preliminary injunction hearing, Novo, represented by Rosenman and Colin, chose to use Mr. Eugene Rzucidlo as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Harriscom Svenska Ab v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distribution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co., LPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Consub Delaware LLC v. Schahin Engenharia LimitadaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- United States ex rel. Elliott v. Brickman Group Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- In re Oxford Health Plans, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Howe v. City of AkronDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.