Legal Opinion

Howe v. City of Akron

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 21, 2011No. Case 5:06CV2779PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

JOHN R. ADAMS, District Judge.

This action is before the Court upon plaintiffs’ Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) to Alter or Amend the Judgment in This Case (Doc. 280). Plaintiffs request that the Court alter or amend the Judgment (Doc. 278), entered on October 2, 2009, to add 11 items. For the reasons set forth in section II below, Doc. 280 is GRANTED IN PART.

This action is also before the Court upon defendant’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial or Remittitur (Fed. R.Civ.P. 50(b) and 59) (Doc. 282). In its Motion…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Elliott v. Brickman Group Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  2. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. GesweinDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  3. Hurt v. Commerce Energy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
  4. William Howe v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. Buzulencia v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API