Legal Opinion
Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Maxwell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 30, 1972No. Nos. 278, 138-142, Dockets 71-1563, 72-1638-72-1640, 72-1611 and 72-1654PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Chief Judge:
This case, in which the plaintiffs (hereinafter collectively referred to as Leasco) seek large damages allegedly resulting from the purchase of shares of a British company on the London Stock Exchange, first came to our attention in October, 1971, on Leasco’s appeal from a judgment entered by Judge Lasker in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, 319 F.Supp. 1256, dismissing the complaint as against defendant Isidore Kerman, a London solicitor, for lack of jurisdiction over the person. Consideration of the questions presented by that appeal led us to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc., and Lehigh Colonial Corporation, Vsv. Norman Birenbaum, and David BirenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.