Legal Opinion

Jessen v. Peterson, Nelson & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1912No. Civ. No. 923PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

In this action the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for the sum of $1,000, as damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the negligent and reckless driving of a horse and vehicle owned by the defendant and which, at the time of the accident, was being used in the business of the defendant and under the control of one of its agents.

The plaintiff’s complaint alleged damages to her as the result of the accident, aggregating the sum of $2,310. Of this amount $2,000 was claimed for injuries to plaintiff’s person and $310 was alleged to have been expended by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Bath v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Millard v. Supreme Council of American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Smith v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Mulvehill v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Mauchle v. Panama-Pacific Internatonal Exposition Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Chamberlain v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Limerick v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Martinelli v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API