Legal Opinion

Dixie-Vortex Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 17, 1942No. Civ. A. No. 354PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, District Judge

This case involves questions of the alleged infringement and the validity of Holman Patent No. 1,594,517, Barbieri Patent No. 1,610,192, Smith & Bild Patent No. 2,203,510, and Amberg Patent No. 2,203,513.

The Holman Patent No. 1,594,617 discloses and claims a paper cup forming machine. The Smith & Bild Patent No. 2,203,510 discloses and claims an improved method of making and improvements in a machine for making paper cups. Amberg Patent No. 2,203,513 discloses and claims improvements in the method and machine disclosed in Smith & Bild No. 2,203,510.

The parties have stipulated that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
  4. Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Siemens-Halske Electric Co. v. Duncan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dixie-Vortex Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  2. Dixie Cup Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  3. de Graffenried v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API