Legal Opinion
de Graffenried v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 31, 1992No. 541-80CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In this patent action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, plaintiff, Albert L. de Graffenried, seeks compensation from the United States for the unauthorized use of a device covered by certain claims of plaintiff’s patent, United States Patent No. 3,217,568 (the ’568 patent). In a prior decision, this court held that (1) the pertinent claims of the ’568 patent are valid, (2) those claims cover a controller system used in the guided boring of large gun barrels at the Watervliet Arsenal in Watervliet, New York (the Arsenal), and (3) plaintiff’s suit is not barred by the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Jerome H. Lemelson v. The United States, the Bendix Corporation and Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bruce v. Weekly World News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Gargoyles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Fastship, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- De Graffenried v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.