Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Altvater

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1933No. 9602PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The appellants were plaintiffs in the court below, and the appellees defendants, and they will be so referred to in this opinion.

This suit is to compel specific performance of a license agreement under United States letters patent No. 1,681,033, issued to Benjamin W. Freeman August 14, 1928, upon an application filed December 3,1923, for a cutout machine for shoe uppers; to enjoin acts alleged to be in violation of that agreement; and for an accounting.

Briefly, the situation out of which the controversy arises is this: Both parties are and were designers, manufacturers,…

2Cases cited94 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. G. H. Packwood Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis Janitor Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  5. Western Supplies Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API