Legal Opinion

McMurray v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1860PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Land Court. This was a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien. It is sufficient to state, in addition to the facts set forth in the opinion of the court, that the amount found at the settlement on December 20, 1856, to have been due the plaintiffs at the time of the completion of the work, November 29, 1856, was 11,610.87. The note given the plaintiffs on the 20th of December was for this sum, including legal interest up to that date — 11,635.03. In this…

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Land Court. This was a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien. It is sufficient to state, in addition to the facts set forth in the opinion of the court, that the amount found at the settlement on December 20, 1856, to have been due the plaintiffs at the time of the completion of the work, November 29, 1856, was 11,610.87. The note given the plaintiffs on the 20th of December was for this sum, including legal interest up to that date — 11,635.03. In this suit the plaintiffs claim $1,610.87, with interest from November 29, 1855. The said sum of $1,610.87 was found to be due…

1Opinion of the CourtScott, Judge

This was a suit on a mechanic’s lien. The materials were furnished and the work completed on the 29th of November, 1856. On the 20th of December following, the account was closed by a negotiable note of the defendant, payable to the plaintiffs ninety days after date. On the 25th of February, 1857, before the note was due, the plaintiffs filed in the land court a lien for the materials furnished and labor performed by them for the defendant. The lien was founded on the account for materials and labor, which had been closed by the note dated 20th of December, and payable ninety days after date.

O…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Putnam v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Muldon v. WhitlockNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  3. Root v. SherwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. EC Robinson Lumber Company v. LowreyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Lane & Bodley Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Mitchell Planing Mill Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Cushwa v. Improvement L. & B. Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API