Legal Opinion

Einstein v. Lewis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 5, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Memorandum.—Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Cook County, appointing a receiver; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Cook County, appointing a receiver under a bill filed, by the appellees, who are simple contract creditors of the firm of Einstein & Co., a firm composed of two sons of Morris Einstein and two other persons.

Being but simple contract creditors of the firm of Einstein & Co., the complainants can not attack the good faith of any of the transactions hereinafter narrated. Durand v. Gray, 129 Ill. 9.

Bor indeed do they claim that they may make such attack; what they claim is, that those transactions should be held to be, or to have the effect…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Preston v. SpauldingIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Durand & Co. v. Gray, Kingman & CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Farwell v. CohenIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re LacovCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  2. Myres v. FrankenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  3. Welch v. RenshawColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Knickerbocker v. McKindley Coal & Mining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Highley v. DeaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API