Legal Opinion

Highley v. Deane

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mortgage Foreclosure.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

Notwithstanding what is urged to the effect that appellant has not appealed from the decree, and that the order appealed from is not one that is appealable, we deem it best to dispose of this case upon the merits.

Appellant urges that as the receiver was not appointed at his instance, although his claim was properly found to be devoid of equity, he ought not to be charged with the expense of the receivership. What appellant did do, was to lile k bill to foreclose a mortgage, afterward found to be fraudulent, and upon this bill he obtained an injunction restraining Bramhall, Deane & Company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Myres v. FrankenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  2. Einstein v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re LacovCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  2. Nutter v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Carroll v. HaighAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API