Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker v. McKindley Coal & Mining Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Intervening Petition.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

A receiver is the hand of the court. The court is an instrumentality resorted to by parties for their convenience. A receiver is, therefore, an agent appointed by the court to serve the parties interested.

It follows that while the estate in the receiver’s hands is the primary fund out of which his proper expenses and compensation are to be paid, if the estate be insufficient or fail, the parties for whom he has acted may be compelled to pay the expense incurred for their benefit. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis Gas Light Co., 11 Mo. App. 237; affirmed, 87 Mo. 224; Einstein v. Lewis, 54 Ill.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. French v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis Gas-Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Myres v. FrankenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  4. Einstein v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  5. Johnson v. GarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowersock Mills & Power Co. v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. Fisher v. Hamilton (In Re Teknek, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Frick v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. ASS Wrecking Co. v. GUARANTY BK. & T. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Lohman v. ClaussenWashington Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API