Legal Opinion

Myres v. Frankenthal

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 1894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit. Attachment in aid and garnishee proceedings. In the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. Error by Albert M. Myres, surviving partner, etc. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

delivered the opinion oe the Court.. On the 25th day of October, 1893, Emanuel Frankenthal was in possession of the place of business, stock of goods, etc., of the firm of Frankenthal, Freudenthal & Co., the members of which firm are the defendants in error, under a chattel mortgage executed to him by that firm.

On that day the plaintiff in error sued out of the Superior Court an attachment against the firm, and caused the writ to be served upon Emanuel as garnishee, and immediately thereafter, without notice to anybody, moved that court to appoint a receiver over the property so in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Capes v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Einstein v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rachel Castner v. First National Bank of Anchorage, Arctic Cold Storage, Inc., and Union Bank of AnchorageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  2. W. E. Erickson Construction, Inc. v. Congress-Kenilworth Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ephraim v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. In re LacovCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  5. Bellamy v. Washita Valley Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API